From b0bf4d37548ceebf46f89c4377b5e8b945b772ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jc_gargma Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:07:38 -0800 Subject: Fix hotfix names --- ...ays-force-a-context-reload-when-rewinding.patch | 145 --------------------- 1 file changed, 145 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 0006-drm-i915-execlists-Always-force-a-context-reload-when-rewinding.patch (limited to '0006-drm-i915-execlists-Always-force-a-context-reload-when-rewinding.patch') diff --git a/0006-drm-i915-execlists-Always-force-a-context-reload-when-rewinding.patch b/0006-drm-i915-execlists-Always-force-a-context-reload-when-rewinding.patch deleted file mode 100644 index b6214d2..0000000 --- a/0006-drm-i915-execlists-Always-force-a-context-reload-when-rewinding.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,145 +0,0 @@ -From 6ffd5925e2659e589d48b8dcaf06e0b3cc0f4d52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Chris Wilson -Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 21:14:52 +0000 -Subject: drm/i915/execlists: Always force a context reload when rewinding - RING_TAIL - -If we rewind the RING_TAIL on a context, due to a preemption event, we -must force the context restore for the RING_TAIL update to be properly -handled. Rather than note which preemption events may cause us to rewind -the tail, compare the new request's tail with the previously submitted -RING_TAIL, as it turns out that timeslicing was causing unexpected -rewinds. - - -0 0d.s2 1280851190us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: expired last=130:4698, prio=3, hint=3 - -0 0d.s2 1280851192us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 66:119966, current 119964 - -0 0d.s2 1280851195us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4698, current 4695 - -0 0d.s2 1280851198us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4696, current 4695 -^---- Note we unwind 2 requests from the same context - - -0 0d.s2 1280851208us : __i915_request_submit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4696, current 4695 - -0 0d.s2 1280851213us : __i915_request_submit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 134:1508, current 1506 -^---- But to apply the new timeslice, we have to replay the first request - before the new client can start -- the unexpected RING_TAIL rewind - - -0 0d.s2 1280851219us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: submit { 130:4696*, 134:1508 } - synmark2-5425 2..s. 1280851239us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: cs-irq head=5, tail=0 - synmark2-5425 2..s. 1280851240us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: csb[0]: status=0x00008002:0x00000000 -^---- Preemption event for the ELSP update; note the lite-restore - - synmark2-5425 2..s. 1280851243us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: preempted { 130:4698, 66:119966 } - synmark2-5425 2..s. 1280851246us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: promote { 130:4696*, 134:1508 } - synmark2-5425 2.... 1280851462us : __i915_request_commit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4700, current 4695 - synmark2-5425 2.... 1280852111us : __i915_request_commit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4702, current 4695 - synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852296us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: cs-irq head=0, tail=2 - synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852297us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: csb[1]: status=0x00000814:0x00000000 - synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852299us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: completed { 130:4696!, 134:1508 } - synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852301us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: csb[2]: status=0x00000818:0x00000040 - synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852302us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: completed { 134:1508, 0:0 } - synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852313us : process_csb: process_csb:2336 GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_completed(*execlists->active) && !reset_in_progress(execlists)) - -Fixes: 8ee36e048c98 ("drm/i915/execlists: Minimalistic timeslicing") -Referenecs: 82c69bf58650 ("drm/i915/gt: Detect if we miss WaIdleLiteRestore") -Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson -Cc: Mika Kuoppala -Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala -Cc: # v5.4+ -Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200207211452.2860634-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk ---- - drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 18 ++++++++---------- - drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c | 1 + - drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.h | 8 ++++++++ - drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_types.h | 1 + - 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c -index d925a1035c9d..1b4784bfa7e5 100644 ---- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c -+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c -@@ -1157,7 +1157,7 @@ static u64 execlists_update_context(struct i915_request *rq) - { - struct intel_context *ce = rq->hw_context; - u64 desc = ce->lrc_desc; -- u32 tail; -+ u32 tail, prev; - - /* - * WaIdleLiteRestore:bdw,skl -@@ -1170,9 +1170,15 @@ static u64 execlists_update_context(struct i915_request *rq) - * subsequent resubmissions (for lite restore). Should that fail us, - * and we try and submit the same tail again, force the context - * reload. -+ * -+ * If we need to return to a preempted context, we need to skip the -+ * lite-restore and force it to reload the RING_TAIL. Otherwise, the -+ * HW has a tendency to ignore us rewinding the TAIL to the end of -+ * an earlier request. - */ - tail = intel_ring_set_tail(rq->ring, rq->tail); -- if (unlikely(ce->lrc_reg_state[CTX_RING_TAIL] == tail)) -+ prev = ce->lrc_reg_state[CTX_RING_TAIL]; -+ if (unlikely(intel_ring_direction(rq->ring, tail, prev) <= 0)) - desc |= CTX_DESC_FORCE_RESTORE; - ce->lrc_reg_state[CTX_RING_TAIL] = tail; - rq->tail = rq->wa_tail; -@@ -1651,14 +1657,6 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) - */ - __unwind_incomplete_requests(engine); - -- /* -- * If we need to return to the preempted context, we -- * need to skip the lite-restore and force it to -- * reload the RING_TAIL. Otherwise, the HW has a -- * tendency to ignore us rewinding the TAIL to the -- * end of an earlier request. -- */ -- last->hw_context->lrc_desc |= CTX_DESC_FORCE_RESTORE; - last = NULL; - } else if (need_timeslice(engine, last) && - timer_expired(&engine->execlists.timer)) { -diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c -index 374b28f13ca0..6ff803f397c4 100644 ---- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c -+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c -@@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ intel_engine_create_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int size) - - kref_init(&ring->ref); - ring->size = size; -+ ring->wrap = BITS_PER_TYPE(ring->size) - ilog2(size); - - /* - * Workaround an erratum on the i830 which causes a hang if -diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.h -index ea2839d9e044..5bdce24994aa 100644 ---- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.h -+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.h -@@ -56,6 +56,14 @@ static inline u32 intel_ring_wrap(const struct intel_ring *ring, u32 pos) - return pos & (ring->size - 1); - } - -+static inline int intel_ring_direction(const struct intel_ring *ring, -+ u32 next, u32 prev) -+{ -+ typecheck(typeof(ring->size), next); -+ typecheck(typeof(ring->size), prev); -+ return (next - prev) << ring->wrap; -+} -+ - static inline bool - intel_ring_offset_valid(const struct intel_ring *ring, - unsigned int pos) -diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_types.h -index d9f17f38e0cc..3cd7fec7fd8d 100644 ---- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_types.h -+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_types.h -@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ struct intel_ring { - - u32 space; - u32 size; -+ u32 wrap; - u32 effective_size; - }; - --- -cgit v1.2.2-1-gc45e - -- cgit v1.2.1